Uber

Methodology

Uber's fair value calculation is complicated by the company's transition from unprofitable growth to sustainable profitability, where GAAP earnings include stock-based compensation and investment losses that distort traditional P/E analysis. The method becomes more applicable as the business matures and earnings stabilize, but investors should adjust for equity compensation and focus on adjusted EBITDA or free cash flow-based valuation. Fair value estimates are most reliable when normalized for mature-market economics rather than current blended results.

Methodology

PEG ratios for Uber should be interpreted cautiously because growth rates reflect the mix of mature rideshare markets with decelerating growth and emerging delivery and freight businesses with higher growth potential. As the company transitions toward profitability and consistent earnings, PEG becomes more relevant, though investors should focus on segment-level economics rather than consolidated results. Comparing Uber's PEG to other platform businesses provides context, but free cash flow conversion and take-rate trends matter more than the ratio itself.

Methodology

Uber pays no dividend and has no plans to initiate one, as management prioritizes reinvesting in geographic expansion, new mobility products, and autonomous vehicle development. PEGY therefore equals PEG with no yield component, reflecting the company's growth-oriented capital allocation strategy. For Uber investors, evaluating rideshare market maturity, delivery profitability, and autonomous optionality matters far more than dividend income.